Pilot Area Roadmap for the City of Tartu
Annelinn and Karlova are two neighbourhoods in Tartu representing two important and very different parts of the city’s housing stock. Together, they accommodate approximately one-third of Tartu’s entire population of 32,995 residents, reflecting both the technical and social challenges of renovation. Annelinn includes a large number of typical Soviet-era apartment buildings, where renovation can have a significant impact due to the scale and high energy use of the building stock. Karlova, in contrast, is a historic wooden district where renovation requires more tailored solutions, balancing energy efficiency with heritage preservation. Together, these areas were selected as a CEESEN-BENDER pilot because they are suitable for testing solutions that can be applied more widely across the city.
Many buildings in the pilot areas are old and energy-inefficient, leading to high heating costs. Priority buildings were identified using a CEESEN-BENDER tool based mainly on socio-economic indicators — income, household structure, and elderly share — and are mainly pre-1990 apartment buildings with lower or unknown energy performance and more vulnerable residents. A significant share of residents have limited financial capacity, making it difficult to co-finance renovation even with available grants. Main funding comes from the national renovation grant managed by the Estonian Business and Innovation Agency (EIS), covering up to 30–50% of costs and combined with bank loans, though calls are periodic and currently closed, and no dedicated schemes for energy-poor households exist. Renovation aims to achieve at least energy class C, reducing energy demand by 50–60% and improving indoor comfort, with three pilot buildings having already applied for renovation support and currently awaiting results.

The CEESEN-Bender project has received funding from the European Union’s Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE 2021-2027) under grant agreement n° LIFE 101120994.
The information and views set out in this homepage are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union or CINEA. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
